Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8 ( 1991 ) 67-83 Elsevier
Towards a new theory of innovation management: A case study comparing Canon, Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc. Ikujiro Nonaka
Institute of Business Research, Hitotsuhashi University, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Applied Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
This paper argues that innovation can be best understood as an information process which is then concretized as a product that meets demand. Two very different firms, Canon Inc. and Apple Computer Inc., are used as case study illustrations. Innovation does not proceed through logical deduction, but rather is furthered by the use of metaphors and analogies. The bureaucratic and staid structures of the firm can be challenged and broken up to provide the space for innovations to emerge. The leader’s role in the innovating firm is as a catalyst and facilitator, not as an allknowing despot. The importance of innovations is not merely in the new product, but also the “ripple” effects of innovations which can propel the firm into a self-renewal process. Keywords: Innovation management, High-technology, Case study.
1. Introduction Increasingly, corporate competitive success is hinging upon the effective management of innovation. Innovation has been the object of considerable academic study from a variety of perspectives. However, innovations are usually considered as objects. We choose to look at innovation differently. For us, innovation is a process by which new information is created, and it is this information that is embodied in the product. To understand this process we conceptualize human beings not merely as information processors (Galbraith, 1973), but more importantly as information creators. Inherently, innovation is the process by which new information emerges and is concretized in a product that meets human needs1. The healthy firm is a negative-entropy system 1
For one of the most interesting treatments of the process by which the inventor or innovator imagines the new development, see Usher (1954).
0923-4748/91/$03.50 (© 1991—Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
which constantly creates new order and structure in its struggle to survive and grow 2. 2. Approaches to innovation We break with the model posited by Simon (1969) and elaborated by Abernathy (1978) of innovation as problem-solving. In fact, most important in the innovation process is the problem creation moment. That is, the positing of the correct problem, which allows the solution to be discovered (information to be created). The key to the creation process is information. Information can be divided into two categories: syntactic and semantic (Machlup and Mansfield, 1983; Nonaka, 1987). Syntactic information can be reduced to a digital form which has no inherent meaning. This is exemplified by the discrete type of information used in computers and which can be manipulated through logical operation. The process of interpreting the results gives this type of information value and meaning3. Semantic information is qualitative; what is important here is the meaning or content of the information 4. Semantic information is more holistic and capable of evolving and transforming. It is not created in the traditional deductive model hypothesized as the way Western science operates, but rather through insights which allow the creation of new models5. The tools in this creation process are often metaphors and analogies (i.e., devices to help in rethinking or even discarding old ways of thinking). Throughout this paper “information” refers to semantic rather than syntactic information. Thus, information creation is used synonymously with meaning creation. Product innovation can be considered as a restricted subset of this creation process. However, it would be a mistake to think that the meaning creation process either can be or should be restricted to...
References: Abernathy, W., 1978. The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD. Aoki, M., 1989. Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Baumol, W. and Benhabib, J., 1989. Chaos, sign)ficance, mechanisms, and economic applications. J. Econ. Perspect., 3(1): 77-105. Burns, T. and Stalker, G., 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London. Canon, Inc., 1987. Canon Handbook. Canon, Inc., Tokyo. Daft, R. and Weick, K., 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Manage. Rev., 9(2): 284-295. Florida, R. and Kenney, M., 1990. The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America '.s Inability to Link Production and Innovation. Basic, New York. Galbraith, J., 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Guterl, F., 1984. Design case history: Apple 's Macintosh. IEEE Spectrum, (December): 34-43. Imai, K., Nonaka, 1. and Takeuchi, H., 1985. Managing the new product development process: How Japanese companies learn and unlearn. In: K. Clark, R. Hayes and C. Lorenz (Eds.), The Uneasy Alliance. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, pp. 337 376. Kenney, M., 1986. Some observations on the structure of the U.S. and Japanese biotechnology industries. Hitotsubashi Bus. Rev., 34 (December): 20 37 (in Japanese). Kodama, F., 1988. Japanese innovation in mechatronics technology. Sci. Public Policy, 13 (1): 44 51. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1979. Laboratory Life. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. Machlup, F. and Mansfield, E. (Eds. ),1983. The Study of Information. Wiley, New York. Moritz, M., 1984. The Little Kingdom. Morrow, New York. Nitanda, H., 1984. Personal interview by I. Nonaka (November 28). Nonaka, 1., 1987. Managing the firm as an information creation process. Working paper, Institute of Business Research, Hitotsubashi University, January. Nonaka, 1., 1988a. Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese firms. Calif Manage. Rev., 30(3). Nonaka, 1., 1988b. Toward middle-up-down management: Accelerating information creation. Sloan Manage. Rev., (Spring): 9-18. Nonaka, 1. and Yamanouchi, T., 1989. Managing innovation as a self-renewing process. J. Bus. Venturing. Parsons, T., 1951. The Social System. Free Press, New York. Peters, T., 1988. Thriving on Chaos. Macmillan, New York. Prigogine, l., 1980. From Being to Becoming. Freeman, San Francisco, CA. Prigogine, l. and Stengers, I., 1984. Order Out of Chaos. New Science Library, Boulder, CO. Quinn, W., 1985. Managing innovation: Controlled chaos. Harv. Bus. Rev., (May-June): 73 80.
Rose, H. and Rose, S. (Eds.), 1976. The Political Economy of Science. Macmillan, London. Saito, K., 1984. Personal interview by I. Nonaka (November 28). Schoonhoven, G. and Jelinek, M., 1990. Dynamic tension in innovative, high technology firms: Managing rapid technological change through organizational structure. In: M. Glinow and s. Mohrman (Eds.), Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 90~ 118. Schumpeter, J. (abridged by Rending Fels), Busines.s Cycles. McGraw-Hill. New York. Sculley, J., 1988. Odyssey. Harper and Row, New York. Simon, H., 1969. The Science of the Artificial. Free Press, New York. Takeuchi, H. and Nonaka, I., 1986. The new product development game. Harv. Bus. Rev., 64 (1): 1.17 146. Tanaka, H., 1984. Personal interview by 1. Nonaka (September 10). Usher, A., 1954. A History of Mechanical Inventions. Boston: Harvard, IJniversity Press, Boston, MA. Walton, M., 1985. Mind behind the Mac. Bay Area Computer Currents, (May 7): 13-28. Young, J., 1988. Steven Jobs: The Journey is the Reward. Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL
Please join StudyMode to read the full document