Quo vadis TAM

Topics: Information Systems Research, Scientific method, Research Pages: 19 (5436 words) Published: January 27, 2014
Quo vadis, TAM?
Izak Benbasat
Sauder School of Business
University of British Columbia
izak.benbasat@ubc.ca
Henri Barki
HEC Montréal
henri.barki@hec.ca

The Technology Acceptance model (TAM) is one of the most influential theories in Information Systems. However, despite the model's significant contributions, the intense focus on TAM has diverted researchers’ attention away from other important research issues and has created an illusion of progress in knowledge accumulation. Furthermore, the independent attempts by several researchers to expand TAM in order to adapt it to the constantly changing IT environments has lead to a state of theoretical chaos and confusion in which it is not clear which version of the many iterations of TAM is the commonly accepted one. The present commentary discusses these concerns, speculates on the possible contributions to the current state of affairs, and makes several suggestions to alleviate the problems associated with TAM and to advance IT adoption research to the next stage.

Volume 8, Issue 4, Article 3, pp. 211-218, April 2007

Volume 8

Issue 4

Article 3

Quo vadis, TAM?

1. Introduction
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is generally referred to as the most influential and commonly employed theory in information systems (Lee et al. 2003). Some also consider it to be the only well-recognized theory in IS (having dethroned Nolan’s stage model that had this distinction earlier). The objective of the present commentary is to draw researchers’ attention to the necessity of reorienting IT adoption and acceptance research toward potentially more fruitful avenues and away from “TAM++ research” that adds little knowledge to TAM or its many different versions. The origins of TAM can be traced to the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein and Ajzen 1975). TRA requires that salient beliefs about one’s attitude toward a particular behavior (e.g., buying on the web) be elicited in order to be relevant to the specific behavior being studied. As one approach to eliciting salient beliefs, Davis (1986) and, in one of the most frequently cited papers in IS, Davis et al. (1989) proposed two constructs, perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU), that are included among the set of the perceived characteristics of innovations (Rogers 2003),through which we can capture all relevant beliefs in information technology (IT) usage contexts. Davis’ (1986) approach largely simplified TRA, as well as making it more efficient to conduct IT adoption research and facilitating the aggregation of results across settings. In this regard TAM can be viewed as very successful. However, such success sometimes has unintended consequences. As an alternative approach to eliciting salient beliefs in each specific case associated with an IT use context, Moore (1987) and Moore and Benbasat (1996) proposed utilizing as a generic set of beliefs the full set of perceived characteristics of innovations (Moore and Benbasat 1991) identified in Rogers’ influential work Diffusion of Innovations (Rogers 2003).

After 17 years of research and a large multitude of studies investigating TAM and its many variants, we now know almost to the point of certainty that perceived usefulness (PU) is a very influential belief1 and that perceived ease of use (PEOU) is an antecedent of PU and an important determinant of use in its own right. Unfortunately, we believe that, in spite of its significant contributions, the intense focus on TAM has led to several dysfunctional outcomes: 1) the diversion of researchers’ attention away from important phenomena. First, TAM-based research has paid scant attention to the antecedents of its belief constructs: most importantly, IT artifact design and evaluation. Second, TAM-based research has provided a very limited investigation of the full range of the important consequences of IT adoption, 2) TAM-based research has led to the creation of an illusion of progress in...

References: Agarwal, R., "Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies," in R.W. Zmud (ed.), Framing the Domains of IT
Management, 2000, Pinnaflex, Cincinnati, OH, 85-104.
Agarwal, R. and E. Karahanna, "Time Flies When You 're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information
Technology Usage," MIS Quarterly, 24, 4 (December 2000), 665-694.
Beaudry, A. and A. Pinsonneault, "Understanding User Responses to IT: A User Adaptation Coping Acts Model," MIS
Quarterly, 29, 3 (September 2005), 493-524.
Benbasat, I. and R. W. Zmud, "Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance," MIS Quarterly, 23, 1
(March 1999), 3-16.
Benbasat, I. and R. W. Zmud, "The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s
Core Properties," MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 (June 2003), 183-194.
Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model," MIS Quarterly,
25, 3 (2001), 351-370.
Bhattacherjee, A. and G. Premkumar, "Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude toward Information Technology
Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test," MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (2004), 229-254.
Burton-Jones, A and Straub, D.W. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems
Research, 17, 3 (2006), 228-246.
Davis, F.D., "A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and
Results", doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R., Warshaw, "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two
Theoretical Models," Management Science, 35, 8 (1989), 982-1003.
Davis, F.D. and Kottemann, J.E. “User Perceptions of Decision Support Effectiveness: Two Production Planning
Experiments,” Decision Sciences 25, 1 (1994), pp
DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E. "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten Year Update,"
Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 9-30.
Doll, W.J. and G. Torkzadeh, "Developing a Multidimensional Measure of System-Use in an Organizational Context,"
Information & Management, 33 (1998), 171-185.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA, 1975.
Gefen, D., E. Karahanna, and D.W. Straub, "Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model," MIS Quarterly, 27,
1 (March 2003), 51-90.
Goodhue, D.L., "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, 41, 12 (December 1995),
1827-1844.
Hebert, Marilynne and I. Benbasat, "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Bedside Terminals by Nursing Staff: A Field Study of
the Diffusion of Innovations in Hospitals," Hospital and Health Services Administration, 39, 3 (1994), 369-383.
Johnson, B. and R. Rice, Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information
System, Columbia University Press, New York, NY,, 1987.
Jiang, Z. and I. Benbasat, "Virtual Product Experience: Effects of Visual and Functional Control on Perceived Diagnosticity in
Electronic Shopping," Journal of MIS, 21, 3 (Winter 2004-2005), 111-147.
Karahanna, E., D.W. Straub, and Chervany, N.L., "Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional
Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs," MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (June 1999), 183-213.
Kim, S.S. and Malhotra, N.K., "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms
Underlying Postadoption Phenomena," Management Science, 51, 5 (May 2005), 741-755.
Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
Lee, Y., K.A. Kozar and K.R.T. Larsen, "The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and the Future," Communications
of the AIS, 12 (2003), 752-780.
Majchrzak, A., R.E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King and S. Ba, "Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer Supported
Inter-Organizational Virtual Team," MIS Quarterly, 24, 4 (2000), 569-600.
Moore, G.C., “End User Computing and Office Automation: A Diffusion of Innovations Perspective”, INFOR 25, 241-235,
1987.
Information Technology, Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, G.B., 1996, 132-146.
Moore, G.C. and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information
Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, 2, 3 (September 1991), 192-222.
Nambisan, S., R. Agarwal and M. Tanniru, "Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information
Technology," MIS Quarterly, 23, 3 (September 1999), 365-395.
Orlikowski, W.J., "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization
Science, 3, 3 (1992), 398-427.
Orlikowski, W.J., "Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective," Information
Systems Research, 7, 1 (March 1996), 63-92.
Orlikowski, W.J. and C.S. Iacono, "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research—A Call to
Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, 12, 2 (June 2001), 121-134.
Papa, W.H. and M.J. Papa, "Communication Network Patterns and the Re-Invention of New Technology," Journal of
Business Communication, 29, 1 (1992), 41-61.
Pavlou, P.A., and M. Fygenson, "Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory
of Planned Behavior," MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (March 2006), 115-144.
Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations (5th edition), New York, NY, Free Press, 2003.
Straub, D.W., Limayem, M. and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. "Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing,"
Management Science, 41, 8 (August 1995), 1328-1342.
Triandis, H.C., "Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior," Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs,
Attitudes, and Values, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, 1980, 195-259.
Vandenbosch, B. and C.H. Higgins, "Information Acquisition and Mental Models: An Investigation into the Relationship
Between Behavior and Learning," Information Systems Research, 7, 2 (June 1996), 198-214.
Van der Heijden, H. "User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (December 2004), 694-704.
Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis and F.D. Davis, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified
View," MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Studies,"
Management Science, 46, 2 (February 2000), 186-204.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Quo Vadis, Philippine Sports?
  • Tam Review Essay
  • Quo Primum Essay
  • Application Of TAM Essay
  • Religion Maintains the Status Quo Essay
  • Henry Tam Case Study Essay
  • Henry Tam and Mgi Team ( Essay
  • Henry Tam Group Case Research Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free