Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
International Journal of Project Management 27 (2009) 745–753 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman
Organizing for innovation in a product development project Combining innovative and result oriented ways of working – A case study Per Sundstrom 1, Annika Zika-Viktorsson * ¨
Royal Institute of Technology, KTH Integrated Product Development, School of Industrial Engineering and Management, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Received 1 July 2008; received in revised form 6 February 2009; accepted 12 February 2009
Abstract This case study investigates how leadership and management support creativity and innovation in the operative work of a product development project team. The aim of the study was to investigate factors that support the generation of new and innovative ideas as well as the eﬃcient evaluation and implementation of ideas into a product. The aim was also to enhance the understanding of innovation when a project is characterized by pressure in terms of tight schedules, the need for progress, and a shortage of competencies. The investigated project provides an example of how innovation in a PD project beneﬁts from pressure. The result shows how the following support a project team’s performance and enhance innovation: a clear vision – accompanied by freedom in the realization of that vision, transparency in the product architecture, enhanced communication and problem ownership. The results show also the interplay between leadership skills, individual characteristics (such as competence, attitude and motivation) and project characteristics (such as sense of urgency and a unique product). Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved. Keywords: Innovation; Creativity; Project management; Product development
1. Introduction This paper presents a study that investigates how leadership and management support creativity and innovation in the operative work of a project team within a product development (PD) project. The leading idea in this paper is that successful projects of this type depend on the generation and implementation of new ideas in a project and on opportunities for explorative work. The case presented provides an unusual example of how a project can achieve * Corresponding author. Address: Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems, Working Life Department. Tel.: +46 8 473 3059. E-mail addresses: email@example.com (P. Sundstrom), annika.zika¨ firstname.lastname@example.org (A. Zika-Viktorsson). URLs: http://www.foi.se (P. Sundstrom), http://www.vinnova.se ¨ (A. Zika-Viktorsson). 1 Address: Swedish Defence Research Agency, Defence Analysis. Tel.: +46 8 5550 3775.
creative solutions and innovations and at the same time maintain a strong orientation toward results and progress. The case is an example of how new knowledge and solutions were developed and managed during the execution phases. Many companies treat innovation as an issue for the early phases of a project, separate from execution phases. This is an approach in accordance with the principles of established linear project models in new product development . However, in this case creativity and innovation were critical to maintain throughout the whole PD project for developing new knowledge and testing new solutions. Exploitation and explorations were managed simultaneously and the creative processes were stimulated while at the same time they were held ‘‘within the box”. A ﬂexible organization, with high levels of freedom and risk taking, is commonly proposed as a way to support innovation. However, not only is that diﬃcult to achieve,
0263-7863/$36.00 Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02.007
P. Sundstrom, A. Zika-Viktorsson / International Journal of Project Management 27 (2009) 745–753 ¨
modiﬁcations are needed for the PD project context. Project organizations face a tough but necessary challenge: to have projects that run eﬃciently...
References:  Trott P. Innovation management and new product development. London: Financial Times, Pitman; 1998.  Benner M, Tushman M. Process management and technological innovation: a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industry. Admin Sci Quart 2002;47(4):676–706.  Murray P, Blackman D. Managing innovation through social architecture, learning, and competencies: a new conceptual approach. Knowl Process Manage 2006;13(3):132–43.  West MA. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl Psychol: An Int Rev 2002;51(3):355–424.  Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K. Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. New York: Wiley; 1997.  Fleming L, Sorense O. Navigating the technology landscape. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 2003;44(2):15–23.  Allen TJ. Organizational structure for product development. Oxford University Press; 2000.  Utterback JM. Mastering the dynamics of innovation: how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press; 1994.  Twiss BC. Managing technological innovation. London: Pitman; 1992.  Tushman ML, Anderson PC. Managing strategic innovation and change: a collection of readings. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.  Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. Product development: past research, present ﬁndings and future directions. Acad Manage Rev 1995;20(2):343–78.  McKenna EF. Business psychology and organisational behaviour: a student’s handbook. Hove: Psychology Press; 2000.  Ekvall G. Creativity in project work: a longitudinal study of a product development project. Creat Inno Manage 1993;2(1):17–26.  Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM. Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leader Quart 2002;13(6):705–50.
 Martins EC, Terblanche. Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. Eur J Inno Manage 2003;6(1): 64–74.  Locke EA, Kirkpatrick SA. Promoting creativity in organizations. In: Gioia DA, Ford CM, Bjorkegren D, Sveiby KE, Nystrom H, editors. ¨ ¨ Creative action in organizations: ivory tower visions & real world voices. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1995.  Wheelwright SC, Clark KB. Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, eﬃciency and quality. New York: Free Press; 1992.  Cooper RG. From experience: the invisible success factors in product innovation. J Prod Inno Manage 1999;16:115–33.  Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley; 2003.  Amabile TM. Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Oxford: Westview; 1996.  Christensen S, Kreiner K. Projektledning: att leda och lara i en ¨ ofullkomlig varld [Project management. To lead and learn in an ¨ imperfect world]. Bjarred: Academia; 1997. ¨  Brady T, Davies A. Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organ Stud 2004;25(9):1601–21. ˚  Lindkvist L. Projekt – struktur for malstyrt larande [Project – ¨ ¨ structure for goal oriented learning]. In: Berggren C, Lindkvist L, ˚ editors. Projekt: organisation for malorientering och larande [Project: ¨ ¨ organizing for goal orientation and learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2001.  Lundin RA, Midler C. Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes. Boston, Mass: Kluwer; 1998.  Cooper RG. Winning at new products: accelerating the process from idea to launch. Cambridge: Perseus; 2001.  Hippel Ev. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford U.P.; 1988.  Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN. Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global industry. Admin Sci Quart 1995;40(1): 84–110. ´  Zika-Viktorsson A, Ritzen S. Project competence in product development. Res Eng Design 2005;15(4):193–200.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document