Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program*

Topics: Innovation, Longitudinal study, Repeated measures design Pages: 42 (12817 words) Published: March 26, 2011
Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program Author(s): Andrew H. Van de Ven and Marshall Scott Poole Source: Organization Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, Special Issue: Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change (1990), pp. 313-335 Published by: INFORMS Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635008 . Accessed: 23/02/2011 06:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=informs. . Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

INFORMS is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Organization Science.

http://www.jstor.org

ORGANIZATION SCIENCE Vol. 1, No. 3, August 1990 Printed in U.S.A.

METHODS FOR STUDYING INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT IN THE MINNESOTA INNOVATION RESEARCH PROGRAM* ANDREW H. VAN DE VEN AND MARSHALLSCOTTPOOLE
StrategicManagementResearch Center, Universityof Minnesota, 271 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 This paper describes the methods being used by the Minnesota Innovation Research Program to develop and test a process theory of innovation which explains how and why innovations develop over time and what developmental paths may lead to success and failure for different kinds of innovations. After a background description of the longitudinal field research, this paper focuses on the methods being used to examine processes of innovation development. These methods pertain to the selection of cases and concepts, observing change, coding and analyzing event data to identify process patterns, and developing theories to explain observed innovation processes. We believe these methods are applicable to other studies that examine a range of temporal processes, including organizational startup, growth, decline, and adaptation. (PROCESS METHODS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; INNOVATION)

Introduction In their extensive review of the innovation literature, Tornatsky et al. (1983) point out that while many studies have examined the antecedents to or consequences of innovation, very few have directly examined how and why innovations emerge, develop, grow, or terminate over time. Yet, an appreciation of the temporal sequence of activities in developing and implementing new ideas is fundamental to the management of innovation. Innovation managers need to know more than the input factors required to achieve desired innovation outcomes. They are centrally responsible for directing the innovating process within the proverbial "black box" between inputs and outcomes. To do this, the innovation manager needs a "road map" that indicates how and why the innovating journey unfolds, and what paths are likely to lead to success or failure. In other words, the innovation manager needs a process theory that explains innovation development.' From a developmental perspective, such a process theory focuses on explaining the temporal order and sequence of steps that unfold as an innovative idea is transformed and implemented...

References: A. (1984), "Event Sequence and Event Duration: Colligation and Measurement," Historical Methods, 17, 192-204. (1990), "A Primer on Sequence Methods," Organization 1, 4. Sci., BRYSON, J. M. AND W. D. ROERING (1989), "Mobilizing Innovation Efforts: The Case of Government Strategic Planning," Chapter 18 in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Agle, and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 583-610. for ProgramPlanning:A Guide DELBECO, A., D. GUSTAFSON AND A. VAN DE VEN (1975), Group Techniques to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman. FOLGER, J. P., HEWES, D. E., AND POOLE, M. S. (1984), "Coding Social Interaction," in B. Dervin and M. Voight (Eds.), Progressin Communication Sciences, 5, Norwood, NJ: Ablex. FREEMAN, JOHN (1983), "Granger Causality and the Time Series Analysis of Political Relationships," American Joumal of Political Science, 27, 337-358. GARUD, R. AND A. H. VAN DE VEN (1989), "Technological Innovation and Industry Emergence: The Case of Cochlear Implants," Chapter 15 in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 489-532. GLASER, B. G. AND A. L. STRAUSS (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategiesfor Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine. KAPLAN, A. (1964), The Conduct of Inquiry:Methodologyfor Behavioral Science, New York: Chandler. KNUDSON, M. K. AND V. W. RUTTAN (1989), "The Management of Research and Development of a Biological Innovation," Chapter 14 in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 465-488. LIN, T. (1989), "SELAGGR: A Selection and Aggregation Program for Bit-Map Data," Minneapolis, MN: Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Technical Report. LORD, F. M. AND M. R. NoviCK (1968), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley. MILES, M. B. AND A. M. HUBERMAN (1984), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. MINTZBERG, H., D. RAISINGHANI, AND A. THEORET (1976), "The Structure of 'Unstructured ' Decision Processes," AdministrativeScience Quarterly,21, 2 (June), 246-275. MITROFF, I. AND J. EMSHOFF (1979), "On Strategic Assumption Making: A Dialectical Approach to Policy and Planning," Academy of Management Review, 4, 1, 1-12. PELZ, D. C. (1985), "Innovation Complexity and the Sequence of Innovating Stages," Knowledge:Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 6, 261-291. PETTIGREW, A. (1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuityand Change in ICI, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. POLLEY, D. AND A. H. VAN DE VEN, (1989), "Therapeutic Apheresis Program Joint-Venture Case," in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 261-276. POOLE, M. S. (1981), "Decision Development in Small Groups I: A Comparison of Two Models," Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24. (1983a), "Decision Development in Small Groups II: A Study of Multiple Sequences in Decision Making," Communication Monographs, 50, 206-232. (1983b), "Decision Development in Small Groups, III: A Multiple Sequence Model of Group Decision Development," Communication Monographs, 50, 321-341. AND J. A. ROTH (1989a), "Decision Development in Small Groups IV: A Typology of Decision Paths," Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356. (1989b), "Decision Development in Small Groups V: Test of a Contingency Model," Human Communication Research, 15, 549-589. , J. P. FOLGER AND D. E. HEWES (1987), "Analyzing Interpersonal Interaction," in M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller (Eds.), InterpersonalProcesses, Beverly Hills: Sage.
ABBOTT,
INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT IN MIRP
POOLE, M. S. AND
335
A. H. VAN DE VEN (1989), "Toward a General Theory of Innovation," Chapter 20 in A. Van de Ven, H. Angle, and M. S. Poole, Research on the Management of Innovation, Cambridge, MA.: Ballinger. RING, P. AND G. RANDS (1989), "Transaction Processes in 3M-NASA Relations," Chapter 10 in A. Van de Ven, H. Angle and M. S. Poole, Research on the Management of Innovation, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 337-366. ROBERTS, N. C. AND P. J. KING (1989), "The Process of Public Policy Innovation," Chapter 9 in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 303-336. SCHROEDER, R., A. VAN DE VEN, G. SCUDDER AND D. POLLEY (1986), "Managing Innovation and Change Processes: Findings from the Minnesota Innovation Research Program," Agribusiness,2, 4, 501-523. STRAUSS, A. L. (1987), QualitativeAnalysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. TORNATSKY, L. G., J. D. EVELAND, M. G. BOYLAN, W. A. HETZNER, E. C. JOHNSON, D. ROLTMAN AND J. SCHNEIDER (1983), The Process of Technological Innovation: Reviewing the Literature,Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, May. VAN DE VEN, A. H. (1980a), "Problem Solving, Planning and Innovation: Part I, Test of the Program Planning Model; and Part II, Speculations for Theory and Practice," Human Relations, 33, 10, 711-740, and 11, 757-779. (1980b), "Early Planning, Implementation, and Performance of New Organizations," Chapter 4 in J. R. Kimberly and R. H. Miles (Eds.), The OrganizationalLife Cycle, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 83-134. (1986), "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science,32, 5, 590-607. AND H. L. ANGLE (1989), "An Introduction to the Minnesota Innovation Research Program," Chapter 1 in A. Van de Ven, H. Angle, and M. S. Poole (Eds.) Research on the Management of Innovation, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 3-30. , H. L. ANGLE, AND M. S. POOLE (Eds.) (1989), Research on the Managementof Innovation, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row. AND Y. CHU (1989), "A Psychometric Assessment of the Minnesota Innovation Survey," Chapter 3 in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 55-104. AND D. L. FERRY (1980), Measuringand Assessing Organizations,New York: Wiley. AND G. WALKER (1984), "The Dynamics of Interorganizational," Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 4, 598-621. , G. WALKER, AND J. LISTON (1979), "Coordination Patterns within an Interorganizational Network," Human Relations, 32, 1, 19-36. VAN DEN DAELE, L. D. (1969), "Qualitative Models in Development Analysis," Developmental Psychology, 1, 4, 303-310. (1974), "Infrastructure and Transition in Developmental Analysis," Human Development, 17, 1-23. VENKATARAMAN, S. AND A. H. VAN DE VEN (1989), "Qnetics New Business Creation Case," in A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, and M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Ballinger/Harper & Row, 228-243.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Innovation Essay
  • Innovation Essay
  • Essay on Research Methods
  • innovation report Essay
  • Innovation Essay
  • Innovation Essay
  • Innovation Essay
  • Essay about INNOVATION

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free