The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0305-5728.htm
Engagement and innovation:
the Honda case
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, and
Received 25 June 2009
Revised 22 September 2009
Accepted 23 September
Honda Motor Group, Ontario, Canada
Purpose – Research and development (R&D) plays a signiﬁcant role in creating and sustaining technological leadership. This paper aims to look at the extent to which R&D interventions stimulate innovation engagement.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper examines, in the main, secondary data sources from Honda to assess the extent to which R&D-enabled plants enjoy both enhanced innovatory potential and employee engagement.
Findings – Initial indications point to a positive correlation between R&D and associated plant performance. Ongoing research suggests that there is a clear link between interventions and enhanced employee engagement. In addition, there appears to be evidence that monoculture outperform multicultural establishments.
Research limitations/implications – The research was exploratory in nature and relied, in the main, on secondary data sources. However, access to the secondary sources was extensive which hopefully compensates for the limited primary data.
Originality/value – Practitioners and academics interested in the relationship between engagement, value add knowledge transfer, R&D and innovation should ﬁnd this paper of interest. Keywords Research and development, Innovation, Knowledge transfer, Knowledge creation, Employee involvement, Automotive industry
Paper type Research paper
VINE: The journal of information and
knowledge management systems
Vol. 39 No. 4, 2009
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
This paper explores the extent to which innovation can be stimulated and value enhanced through the exploitation of research and development (R&D) interventions. Is it possible to co-create value (Vargo et al., 2008), through what is in effect an internal service exchange (a point at which knowledge is transferred and acted upon) between R&D and the shop ﬂoor? The researchers have identiﬁed a case, or approach, that suggests barriers to knowledge transfer (McLaughlin and Paton, 2008a, b) can be overcome and innovative potential released through a directed engagement at shop ﬂoor level. The case company, Honda, appear to be leveraging the knowledge transfer process at the point of exchange between R&D interventions and those charged with implementation. They are combining, as suggested by Chesbrough et al. (2006), Ichijo and Nonaka (2007) and others, knowledge, technology and innovation to build a competitive future.
The twenty-ﬁrst century was forecast to be one of unprecedented technological, market and environmental change (Nonaka, 1991; Lansiti, 1998; Cooper, 2000; Aberdeen Group, 2005; PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2007). This will require a constant ﬂow of ideas that will combine with emergent technologies and be exploited by more
rapid product and service development (Kao, 1997; Aberdeen Group, 2005). This need for change can only be fulﬁlled by systemic creativity and innovation, through, in the main, information communication technology (ICT) (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995; Vincenzi, 2000). Traditionally, within manufacturing at least, the R&D function tends to be regarded as being the primary driver of innovation and change (Gassmann, 2006). This suggests that the strategic importance of the R&D function is likely to grow in industries, for example the automotive industry upon which this paper is based, that strive for a competitive edge based upon product- and process-based innovation (AMR Research, 2003).
Historically, research has suggested that there are a number of tangible beneﬁts awaiting the innovatory organisation: enhanced proﬁts,...
References: Aberdeen Group (2005), “The product innovation agenda benchmark report”, available at: www.
Akgun, A.E., Lynn, G.S. and Byrne, C. (2003), “Organizational learning: a socio-cognitive
framework”, Human Relations, Vol
Andersen, S.O. and Zaelke, D. (2003), Industry Genius: Inventions and People Protecting the
Climate and Fragile Ozone Layer, Greenleaf Publishing, Shefﬁeld.
AMR Research (2003), “Improving innovation and cash ﬂow in automotive”, available at: www.
Calantone, R.J., Schmidt, J.B. and Song, X.M. (1996), “Controllable factors of new product success:
cross-national comparison”, Marketing Science, Vol
Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I. and Tsakanikas, A. (2004), “Internal capabilities and external
knowledge sources: complements or substitute for innovative performance?”,
Chanal, V. (2004), “Innovation management and organizational learning and discursive
approach”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol
Chesbrough, H. (2005), “Towards a science of services”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83,
Chesbrough, H. and Spohrer, J. (2006), “A research manifesto for service science”,
Communications of the ACM, Vol
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds) (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a
New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D. (1989), “Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D”,
The Economic Journal, Vol
Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and
innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol
Cooper, R.G. (1993), Winning at New Products, 2nd Ed., Addison Wesley, New York, NY.
Cooper, R.G. (2000), “Strategic marketing planning for radically new products”, Journal of
Damanpour, F. (1996), “Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing
multiple contingency models”, Management Science, Vol
Department of Trade and Industry (2004), “Making globalization a force for good”, Trade and
Investment white paper, HMSO, London, May.
Department of Trade and Industry (2007), “Innovation in services”, DTI occasional paper No. 9,
HMSO, London, June.
Drejer, A. (2000), “Organizational learning and competence development”, The Learning
ECOM (2005), Doing More With Less: Green Paper on Energy Efﬁciency, Ofﬁcial Publications of
the European Communities, European Commission, Luxemburg.
Estabrooks, C. (2001), “Research utilization and qualitative research”, in Morse, J.M., Swanson, J.M.
Fleming, L. (2001), “Recombinant uncertainty in technological research”, Management Science,
Freeman, C. (1994), “The economics of technical change”, Cambridge Journal of Economics,
Gassmann, O. (2006), “Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda”, R&D
Grant, R.M. (1996), “Prospering in competitive environments: organizational capability as
knowledge integration”, Organization Science, Vol
Grifﬁn, A. (1997), “The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle
time”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol
Han, J.K., Namwoon, K. and Srivastava, R.K. (1998), “Market orientation and performance:
is innovation a missing link?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol
Henderson, R.M. and Cockburn, I. (1994), “Measuring competence: exploring ﬁrm effects in
pharmaceutical research”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol
Hipp, C. and Grupp, H. (2005), “Innovation in the service sector: the demand for service-speciﬁc
innovation measurement concepts and typologies”, Research Policy, Vol
Hong, P., Doll, W.J., Nahm, A.Y. and Li, X. (2004), “Knowledge sharing in integrated product
development”, Journal of Innovation Management, Vol
Lansiti, M. (1998), Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World, Harvard
Business School Press, Boston, MA.
IBM Global Business Services (2006), “Driving innovation: ﬁve opportunities for the automotive
industry”, available at: www.03.ibm.com/industries/automotive/doc
Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. (Eds) (2007), Knowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for
Managers, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Illeris, K. (2002), The Three Dimensions of Learning, Roskilde University Press, Roskilde.
Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes-Lorente, J. and Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005), “Organizational learning and
compensation strategies: evidence from the Spanish chemical industry”, Human Resource
Kalling, T. and Styhre, A. (2003), Knowledge Sharing in Organizations, Copenhagen Business
Kao, J. (1997), Jamming: The Art and Discipline of Corporate Creativity, Harper Collins
Publishers, New York, NY.
Karmarkar, U. (2004), “Will you survive the services revolution?”, Harvard Business Review,
Please join StudyMode to read the full document