Eassay

Topics: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Research Pages: 285 (79322 words) Published: March 23, 2013
Ekonomi och samhälle
Economics and Society
Skrifter utgivna vid Svenska handelshögskolan
Publications of the Hanken School of Economics

Nr 243

Seppo Laukkanen

Making Sense of Ambidexterity
A Process View of the Renewing Effects of Innovation Activities in a Multinational Enterprise

Helsinki 2012
<

Making Sense of Ambidexterity: A Process View of the Renewing Effects of Innovation Activities in a Multinational Enterprise

Key words: innovation, ambidexterity, entrepreneurship, strategic renewal, multinational enterprise

© Hanken School of Economics & Seppo Laukkanen, 2012

Seppo Laukkanen
Hanken School of Economics
Department of Management and Organization
P.O.Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland

Hanken School of Economics

ISBN 978-952-232-165-7 (printed)
ISBN 978-952-232-166-4 (PDF)
ISSN-L 0424-7256
ISSN 0424-7256 (printed)
ISSN 2242-699X (PDF)
Edita Prima Ltd, Helsinki 2012

i

PREFACE
It takes extraordinary effort and commitment to make a scientific contribution. This project took three years of persistent hard work, interspersed with short periods of total devotion, spent cloistered, focusing on this research project. These periods of total devotion enabled me as a researcher to dive deep into the minds of the innovators and fly high with the theories. Such immersion fostered lateral thinking and productive writing, both necessary to finalize this work. The unconditional support of my entire family was integral in this undertaking.

Hanken has been a great academic home for the doctoral work. The great personalities, the state of the art competences and the rich international networks facilitated an elaborative way of working. The elaborative approach to research has been key to my discoveries. In particular, the vast academic experience and accommodating personality of Martin Lindell was crucial for developing the ability to do research grounded on real business rather than merely theoretical frameworks. The empathetic encouragement and practical advice of Eero Vaara helped me push through the “valley of death” in the research project. Ingmar Björkman’s and Saku Mantere’s guidance on theory studies helped me progress swiftly in building the theoretical foundation of the work. I am extremely grateful for the able support of the Leadership and Organization Department at Hanken. In addition, the help of Petri Rosenlöf, Chris Fogarty and Staffan Dellringer has made the outcome of the research easier to digest. Thank you Staffan, Chris and Pete for your contributions in editing the dissertation. In inductive research, the research object takes on an active role. The discoveries are made together. The findings of this study build on the thoughts and insights of the actual innovators at Nokia. Thanks to the access granted by Heikki Norta, Kai Öistämö and Seppo Aaltonen we were able to study illuminating innovation cases. Pia Erkinheimo’s altruistic effort enabled to get hold on the true innovators in those cases. The open attitude and intellectual participation of the innovators brought novel ideas to the theory development. My heartfelt thanks goes out to Nokia and its innovator communities for the privileged access to their experiences and thoughts. In distilling the insights and thoughts of the interviewees to the theories, I have been blessed with the world’s best scholarly guidance. Thorough and constructive feedback from the examiners Robert Burgelman of Stanford and Yves Doz of INSEAD has profoundly improved the quality of my work. Thank you Yves and Robert for the time and effort that you have put into this dissertation!

This research has been conducted in the entrepreneurial spirit. The first phases were conducted as part of a Tekes-project. As the research advanced, the source of funding shifted to the collaborative projects with ICT Shok and Aalto University. Collaboration with Seija Kulkki of CKIR and Reijo Paajanen of TIVIT has been particularly crucial to this work....

References: Allison, 1971: Allison G.T. Essence of Decision. Boston: Little, Brown.
Azevedo, Jane (1997). Mapping Reality: An Evolutionary Realist Methodology for the
Natural and Social Sciences
Azevedo J. (2007). Updating organizational epistemology and research methods.
Baird, I. S: and Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk
Taking
Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 31: 78-108.
Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity Recognition: How Entrepreneurs "Connect the Dots"
to Recognize New Business Opportunities
Baum, J. A. C., and Li, S. X., and Usher, J. M. (2000). Making the Next Move: How
Experimental and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains '
Baumol, W. J. (1986). Entrepreneurhip and a Century of Growth. Journal of Business
Venturing, 1: 141-145.
Begley T. M. and Boyd D. P. (1987). Psychological Characteristics Associated with
Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms and Smaller Businesses
Business Venturing, 1987, 2: 79-93.
Birkinshaw, Julian and Gibson, Cristina (2004). Building Ambidexterity Into an
Organization
Burgelman, RA (1983a). A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate
Context, and the Concept of Strategy
Burgelman, RA (1983b). A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the
Diversified Major Company
Burgelman, RA (1983c). Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management:
Insights from a Process Study
Burgelman, R. A. (1984). Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established
Firms
177
Burgelman, RA (1988) Strategy Making as a Social Learning Process: The Case of
Burgelman, R. A. (1991)Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and
Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field research
Burgelman, R. A. (1994). Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit
in Dynamic Environments
Burgelman, Robert A. (2003). Strategy is Destiny. The Free Press. New York, NY.
Burgelman, Robert A. (2011). Bridging History and Reductionism: A Key Role for
Longitudinal Qualitative Research
Burgelman, Robert A. and Grove, A. S. (2007). Let Chaos Reign, then Reign in Chaos Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity. Stanford
Research Paper Series.
Burgelman, R. A. and Sayles, L. R. (1986). Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy,
Structure and Managerial Skills
Campbell, Donald (1979). Variance and Selective Retention in Socio-cultural Evolution.
Casson, M. C. (1982). The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. Martin Robertson:
Oxford, U.K.
Chaganti, R. and Greene, P. (2002). Who Are Ethnic Entrepreneurs? A Study of
Entrepreneurs ' Ethnic Involvement and Business Characteristics
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator 's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause
Great Firms to Fail
Collins, H. and Young, R. A. (1988) Career development and hermeneutical inquiry,
part 2: Undertaking hermeneutical research, Canadian Journal of Counselling,
Collis, D. J. (1991). A Resource-based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the
Bearings Industry
Cooper, A. C., Willard, G. E. and Woo, C. W. (1986). Strategies of High-Performing New
and Small Firms: A Reexamination of the Niche Concept
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Traditions
Denis, J.-L. and Langley, A. and Cazale, L. (1996). Leadership and Strategic Change
under Ambiguity
Doz, Y. L. (1996). The Evolution of Cooperation in Strategic Alliances. Strategic
Management Journal, 17: 55-83.
Doz, Yves and Kosonen, Mikko (2009). Fast Strategy. Pearson Education.
Drucker, Peter F. (1985), Purposeful Innovation and the Seven Sources for Innovative
Opportunity, in Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, New
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for
Innovation
Dyer, Jeffrey H. and Gregersen, Hal B. and Christensen, Clayton (2008). Entrepreneur
Behaviors, Opportunity Recognition, and the Origins of Innovative Ventures.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Research. Academy of Management
Review, Vol
Fiet, J. O. (2007). A Prescriptive Analysis of Search and Discovery. Journal of
Management Studies 44(4): 592-611.
(2008). Entrepreneurship, Subjectivism, and the Resource-Based View: Toward
a New Synthesis
Gaddis, John L., 2002. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Gasse, Y. (1982). Elaborations on the Psychology of the Entrepreneur. In C.A. Kent,
D.L
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • EASSAY Essay
  • Eassays Essay
  • Eassay Essay
  • Eassays Essay
  • Eassay Essay
  • Eassay Essay
  • Eassay Essay
  • eassay Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free