Teory of Company

Topics: Innovation, Economic growth, Economics Pages: 52 (11134 words) Published: March 13, 2013
Innovation, technology and the global knowledge
economy: Challenges for future growth.

By Jan Fagerberg, University of Oslo *

Paper prepared for “Green roads to growth” project and conference, Copenhagen March 1-2, 2006

This paper discusses the role of knowledge, technology and innovation in economic growth within the context of the “Green roads to growth” project. It summarizes the current state of the art in this area, illustrates this with selected graphs and tables based on published statistics and raises issues for discussion. The main focus is on the big shift of our understanding of economic growth that has taken place in recent decades, exemplified by emergence of terms such as “the knowledge based economy”, “the ICT revolution” and “innovation”, which although not an entirely new issue – did not get much attention a few decades ago. Particular emphasis is placed on reviewing the new micro-evidence on innovation and the knowledgebased economy that has emerged in recent years. However, since extensive micro-evidence on innovation and knowledge-based growth is available only for a limited number of developed economies, we also consider other types of indicators (that are available for a larger set of countries), and present a synthetic overview of the differences in performance across different parts of the globe. Finally we summarize the main trends and discuss the challenges posed by these for future growth, sustainability and policy.

(*) I am indebted to Martin Srholec for assistance in producing many of the empirical illustrations used in this paper and to Mario Pianta and Jørgen Rosted for useful comments and suggestions. Remaining errors and omissions are my own responsibility. Address for correspondence is jan.fagerberg@tik.uio.no (P.O. Box 1108 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway).


It is difficult to find an issue that is more central to policy makers’ agenda than how to achieve economic growth. Indeed, it is generally acknowledged that economic growth is seen as essential for the realization of important policy objectives, such as income, welfare (including the environment) and – last but not least - employment. The ability of a country to foster economic growth and, hence, realize other important policy objectives is what is often termed the “competitiveness” of a country (Fagerberg 1988, 1996, Fagerberg, Knell and Srholec 2004). Therefore it comes as no surprise when policy makers in the European Union want to make Europe the most competitive region in the global knowledge based economy (the Lisbon agenda). What this means is simply to get the European Union on a growth path that is consistent with the realization of important policy objectives. Although this may sound simple enough experience tells us that getting there may not be just as simple. In fact, the EU has not come very far in realizing the ambitious goals of the Lisbon agenda, and concerns have been expressed on to what extent the political steps taken in order to do so are really appropriate. This reminds us of the important insight that any policy aimed at raising long-term growth has to be based on a thorough understanding of the factors behind growth and the concrete circumstances into which the policy is going to be implemented. In the next sections we discuss the first of these issues in a bit more detail. Focus will be on the big shift of our understanding of economic growth that has taken place in recent decades, exemplified by emergence of terms such as “the knowledge based economy” (which seems to be on everybody’s lips these days), “the ICT revolution” and “innovation” (which - although not an entirely new issue – did not get much attention a few decades ago). Particular emphasis is placed on reviewing the new micro-evidence on innovation and the knowledge-based economy that has emerged in recent years and the conclusions that can be drawn from this on how knowledge based growth works at what the...

References: Acemoglu, D. (2002) Technical change, inequality and the labor market, Journal of Economic
Literature 40: 7-72
Aghion, Philippe, and P. Howitt (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Archibugi, D. and A. Coco (2004) “A new indicator of technological capabilities for
developed and developing countries (ArCo)”, World Development 32: 629-654.
Barro, R. J. and Jong-Wha Lee (2000). International Data on Educational Attainment:
Updates and Implications
Bresnahan, T.F., E. Brynjolfsson and L.M. Hitt (2002) Information technology, workplace
organization and the demand for skilled labour: Firm-level evidence, Quarterly Journal of
Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D. (1990). “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning
and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 123.
Dahlman, C. J. and J.-E. Aubert (2001). China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st
Dosi, G. (1988). “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of
Economic Literature 26: 1120−1171.
Edquist. C. (2004) Systems of innovation – perspectives and challenges, ch. 7 in J. Fagerberg,
Press, Oxford
Eurostat (2004)
Eurostat (2005) Community Innovation Survey-3. Luxembourg, Eurostat.
Ernst, D. J. Fagerberg and J. Hildrum (2002). “Do Global Production Networks and Digital
Informations Systems Make Knowledge Spatially Fluid?” TIK Working paper no
Fagerberg, J. (1994) Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates, Journal of
Economic Literature 32: 1147-75
Fagerberg, J. (1996). Technology and Competitiveness”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy,
12: 39-51.
Fagerberg, J. (2003) Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: An appraisal of
the literature, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13: 125-159
Fagerberg, J. (2004). “Innovation: A Guide to the Literature.” Chapter 1 in Oxford Handbook
of Innovation, J
⎯⎯⎯, and M. M. Godinho (2004). “Innovation and Catching-Up.” Chapter 19 in Oxford
Handbook of Innovation, J
⎯⎯⎯, P. Guerrieri, and B. Verspagen, editors (1999), The Economic Challenge for Europe:
Adapting to Innovation-Based Growth
⎯⎯⎯, M. Knell, and M. Srholec (2004). “The Competitiveness of Nations.” Paper prepared
for the Second Globelics Conference, Beijing, China, October 18−20.
Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freeman, C. and F. Louca (2001) As Times Goes By. From the Industrial Revolutions to the
Information Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press
GGDC (2005) Groningen Growth and Development Centre and The Conference Board, Total
Economy Database
Granstrand, O. (2004). “Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights.” Chapter 10 in Oxford
Handbook of Innovation, J
ISO (2004) The ISO Survey of ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001 Certificates. Geneve,
International Organization for Standardization.
ITU (2005)World Telecommunication
Telecommunication Union.
Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Kerea’s Technological Learning,
Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.
Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg (1986) “An Overview of Innovation”, in R. Landau and N.
Lall, S. (2000). “Technological Change and Industrialization in the Asian Newly
Industrializing Economies: Achievements and Challenges.” In Technology, Learning, &
Lam, A. (2004). “Organizational Innovation.” Chapter 5 in Oxford Handbook of Innovation,
Lundvall, B. Å. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and
Interactive Learning, London: Pinter
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Company Law Essay
  • Companies Essay
  • The Company Essay
  • maslow teory Essay
  • Unilever Company Essay
  • Southern Company Essay
  • Essay about Company Law Assignment
  • Essay about Newell Company

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free